Has your gut been telling you that something has been very, very wrong this past year?
Have you been repeatedly saying out loud ‘none of this makes sense’?
B12 deficiency patients often feel let down by their doctors and certainly last year meant that so many have not been able to access vitamin B12 injections that they so desperately need. This has meant that for many, their health and trust in their doctor has taken many steps backwards due in part to harmful government guidance.
Why were so many injections stopped for people but testing of B12 levels of those already prescribed them carried out?
Why were people told they could suddenly access B12 from food when they couldn’t?
Why is this professor of haematology stating “given that a typical dose survives in the body for up to two years and once the patient has the first few injections there is no ongoing deficiency. We can be confident that these fluctuating symptoms are not related in any way to B12” ?
Now even the average doctor knows that most of what gets into the system from one injection is excreted in the first 24 hours and that’s why NICE Guidance suggest every other day injections.
Why, when we wrote and challenged this ridiculous statement, are we still awaiting a reply?
Why is this GP who ‘cares’ for this patient – (a single mother of autistic children who was; exhausted, stumbling, constantly nauseous, struggling with brain fog and unable to function properly), asking and then adhering to advice from this professor, not using her own clinical judgement to properly treat her patient? Note that her letter doesn’t mention B12 at all but see how it is stated twice, that she ‘cannot do something outside of the shop/realm of the practice’.
This came after a request for more frequent injections, the lockdowns we have all endured have had far reaching effects of most of society and the stress this mum was under required more, listening, more action, more frequent injections and more care from this GP. Not letters to ‘specialists’ who clearly understand very little about B12 deficiency.
Instead of increasing the frequency of her injections at this point, they moved her back to 3 monthly from 8 weekly, despite the debilitating and obvious B12 deficiency symptoms and a confirmed diagnosis of PA.
What has the world come to when there is a safe, cheap, affective medicine available but people are denied it because of some bizarre and incorrect idea that a GP cannot use their own clinical judgement to save their patient from pain, confusion and distress?
Why is it that just about everybody is offered a COVID vaccine, whether deemed to ‘need’ it or not, but people have to fight tooth and nail for a safe, life saving vitamin B12 injection?
This past year has been the most difficult period any of us has lived through
I know that some have benefitted greatly from less stress free life, no commute, more time with children and a bigger ‘rest’ than they have ever had before, but so many more have been devastated by the impact.
Throughout the lockdowns, many have repeated the line ‘what are you complaining about, you are not in a war, you’re just being asked to stay at home and watch the telly’.
But, people who experienced the war have said that this has been far worse. At least during war people were allowed to be together, they were not made fearful of speaking to or hugging another person, of touching something someone else had touched, of singing and live music, of sports. They weren’t forced to bury a loved one, sitting alone masked. This past year has been hellish for far too many. Fear and loneliness descended overnight for millions of people. Why?
Why would any government advocate isolation when loneliness is seen by many as one of the largest health concerns we face? Here are the facts.
This team “found that the risk of early death associated with loneliness, social isolation, and living alone was equal to or greater than the premature death risk associated with obesity and other major health conditions.”
We need face to face contact whether we are introverts or extraverts, our hearts need face to face contact, please see this study: Social interaction moderates the relationship between depressive mood and heart rate variability
Results and conclusion: Multilevel analyses revealed that depression was related to elevated negative affect and higher heart rate throughout the day. Moreover, there was a tendency toward lower HRV in individuals with higher depression scores. This association, however, was moderated by social context. When depressive participants were alone they evidenced lower HRV and higher negative affect, but not when they were engaged in social interactions with a partner, family members, or friends. These findings suggest that the relation between depression and cardiac autonomic control could be altered by social interaction, thus possibly buffering adverse health effects.
After the first lockdown, my neighbour said that she thought she had forgotten how to laugh. For so many laughter has been replaced by intense fear, panic and obsessive disinfecting.
Open Letter Concerning the Police Enforcement of ongoing COVID-19 restrictions – This is from Senior Constable Alexander Cooney NSW Police.
Covid measures will be seen as ‘monument of collective hysteria and folly’ says ex-judge – Jonathan Sumption, former British supreme court justice, slams ‘cavalier use of coercive powers’ and ‘loss of freedom’
Dr Sebastian Rushwoth asks ‘What are the harms of lockdown?’ he gives us some fantastic clear data and sadly highlights the Rise in the incidence of abusive head trauma during the COVID-19 pandemic from Great Ormond Street Children’s hospital.
What are we not being allowed to see and why?
Are you like me and want to know what is being kept from you? When someones tells you that ‘you don’t need to see that’ or hear that, that this makes you want to hear and see whatever it is that you are being prevented from seeing? Then please read on.
Why were we all locked down when there was absolutely no need? This UK government document clearly states that on the 19th March 2020, (yes that’s right, last year, before we were all stopped from seeing each other) “COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK”.
What happened next simply didn’t make any sense but it’s clear that the government are obviously planning for restrictions to be a long term thing, see their contracts finder for The Provision of Covid Marshalls.
And this £320 million pound contract for Provision of Media buying services for COVID 19 campaigns. Who got that contract and why?
Additionally in Frederick Edward’s Article Covid scaremongering – the government’s £1bn blitz he states:
Since my article in February, more data has come to light. The Cabinet Office has continued spending heavily on Covid media campaigns, mainly through its media buying partner Manning Gottlieb, laying out just over £87million in the first three months of 2021. This brings its Covid advertising spend to more than £280million between April 2020 and March 2021.
So that will be 600 million pounds spent on advertising. Wow.
Freedom of movement
2020 Was the year we saw two women walking with a coffee in a public place, fined £200 and accused of that heinous crime of ‘having a picnic’. It was also the year that my local council and many more, I’m sure, tried (unsuccessfully) to close natural outdoor spaces. At this point, you, like me feared the world had really gone mad.
Some Government ministers and their mates, suppliers of perspex, stickers or tape, PCR tests and PPE have done very well financially but, this past year has made so many vulnerable people a million times worse off than they were before.
This very short film, from Ivor Cummins’ Channel, I feel, puts things in perspective very simply.
The following excerpt was written by Steve Waterson, Editor of The Australian The sentiment of what he says below will be shared by many:
“I would describe that rise with the COVID-appropriate word “unprecedented”, except the rate has been higher before, most recently in 2008, when I don’t believe the world shut down. Oh yes, and it was higher in every single year before 2008, right back to 1838, when the records begin.
So if the impact of deaths from COVID (and I think we all know by now we should be saying “with”, not “from”) is not as bad as it first appeared, why are British hospitals reported to be almost overflowing, at or near 90% occupancy? Unprecedented again, until you note the country’s National Health Service has the entirely reasonable efficiency goal of having fewer than 15% of beds lying vacant at any time.
Or might the fact that in the past 30 years Britain has reduced the number of hospital beds from 300,000 to 140,000, while adding 10 million to its population, shed some light on the situation?
Sweden, poster nation for personal freedom during the pandemic, and whipping boy for lockdown enthusiasts, has recorded a 2020 death rate that has not been matched in its history since — drum roll, please — 2015.
But, the critics point out, even King Carl XVI Gustaf has said they handled the crisis badly. I’d never known being a king gave you medical expertise, but I’m no authority on Scandinavian monarchy.
So no, self-congratulating leaders, you have not “kept us safe”.
You have destroyed thousands of businesses, families, lives and futures. You have cheated people of the highlights of human existence, the moments of shared joy and sorrow, the weddings, births, anniversaries, farewells and funerals that mark our journey through life.
You have placed unimaginable burdens of debt and despair on future generations, and crafted a dangerous template for all the idiots who follow you.
And to use your own arrogant formulation, I make no apology for saying that.
You can read the full text here.
Freedom of speech
Now I don’t remember moving to a place under a totalitarian regime, but it seems most of us live live there now.
When just about every doctor advocating natural health I follow, has been de-platformed and banned from YouTube you know something sinister is afoot. You might be thinking I’ve lost the plot at this point and if so, I’m asking you to take a leap of faith and carry on reading and watching.
Look at what happens to people trying to give the other side of the story in a calm and measured way. The email exchange between Dr Hilary and Ian ‘Fantom’, which precedes this recording, shows without a shadow of doubt that we are not being given the whole picture. Why are they stopping any kind of debate?
Do you wonder why do we get to hear billionaire Bill’s opinions repeatedly but medical professionals around the world are being censored and silenced?
Personally, I would rather listen to what is really happening from Vandana Shiva PhD, than a bloke who, amongst other things, is the biggest private owner of farmland in the US and thinks that creating synthetic beef and messing with the sun is ok. He’s also the biggest funder of the World Health Organisation. You can read more about the havoc he’s been creating here.
Were you aware that the definitions of herd immunity, vaccine and pandemic have been altered? Why?
The WHO’s original definition of a pandemic was:
“… when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several, simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.”
This switch in definition allowed the WHO to declare swine flu a pandemic after a mere 144 people had died from the infection, worldwide, and it’s why COVID-19 is still promoted as a pandemic even though it has caused no excess mortality in nine months.”
The Alliance for Natural Health have been closely following the events of the past year too, here’s a snippet from their interview on censorship & marginalisation with Dr Michelle Perro, a renowned, California-based paediatrician of some 40 years standing.
Dr Perro says in the interview, “We as integrative medicine practitioners, particularly during this particular era in this last year, have been marginalised with our integrative tools. I think it’s horrific how we’ve been marginalised to kind of promote a single-minded agenda and to discredit those of us that practice holistically. There has been a campaign to discredit and censor our group.”
She adds, “By keeping us separate, by keeping us masked, they’re trying to stop us aligning… We have more power in groups and organising ourselves…We can do something!”
Kamran Abbassi, Executive Editor of the BMJ states: When good science is suppressed by the medical-political complex, people die
“Politicians and governments are suppressing science. They do so in the public interest, they say, to accelerate availability of diagnostics and treatments. They do so to support innovation, to bring products to market at unprecedented speed. Both of these reasons are partly plausible; the greatest deceptions are founded in a grain of truth. But the underlying behaviour is troubling.
Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health.1 Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science…….”
Social media and morality
Tucker Carlson calls out Facebook for banning LifeSiteNews
“Our health authorities have reserved their energy for anyone who dares to question vaccines,” explained Carlson. “LifeSiteNews – that’s a non-profit news organization – just found itself permenantly banned from Facebook. Why? Because it reported government numbers from the VAERS database – something that we just did on the air.”
YouTube are deciding we can’t see or read things they don’t want us to, they state:
YouTube doesn’t allow content that spreads medical misinformation that contradicts local health authorities’ or the World Health Organization’s (WHO) medical information about COVID-19…..
Very odd when platforms allow all manner of sickening videos on many subjects, but now we can’t question anything to do with COVID and eminent experts working in the fields of science and medicine are censored. Why? We need to remember Billionaire Bill and his private companies are the biggest funders of the WHO, therefore the biggest influencer, meaning the biggest controller.
Author Margaret Stevenson writes; “Fear as a weapon to control has allowed the suppression of science of the medical – political complex for financial and political gain….”
UK Column received this – Whistleblower: Newspaper industry chiefs criminally negligent over Covid scaremongering–
“…It is our duty to present both sides of a story impartially, and in that task we have failed to such an extent that I feel there has been criminal negligence from those at the top of the industry, who must take responsibility for the skewed narrative we have offered for more than a year now.
I have had many sleepless nights thinking about the horrors that are happening in hospitals and care homes—and more recently as a result of the vaccines—as a result of the Covid protocols that we as a newspaper industry are turning a blind eye to, or are playing down the significance of. And the devastating fear programming of children that we have become a part of is something that is equally cruel and criminal….”
Why were we expected to wear masks when research shows that: “Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression.
The research paper – Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis, which also concludes: “Governments, policy makers and health organizations should utilize prosper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive intervention for public health. – Has, surprise, surprise, been retracted. Why?
Please also see these two articles:
Why have deaths been reported as ‘from COVID’ when they should (if they are) be deaths ‘with COVID’?
So if you are on a bike and have a fatal head on collision with a bus, but you had a positive PCR test 2 weeks ago, it will be reported that you died of COVID, but you didn’t. This is how figures have been reported and therefore manipulated. You might have seen this kind of Numberwang played out before and 3.30 minutes in, is a classic display of ‘government maths’:
Real maths should dictate that if Peter has ten apples and gives Jane eight apples he is left with two apples. But not if we apply it to the ‘government maths’ used for COVID Deaths. This would mean that Peter, at the point he gave Jane eight apples, had two left, but he really still has ten because he’d had ten in the past 28 days. Meanwhile, Jane had eight apples but had been exposed to the other two apples because she saw them in Peter’s possession, so she essentially has ten apples too. This makes ten apples into a nice round twenty apples. That’s Numberwang or ‘government maths’.
Why is reporting and data collection done in this way? Well, it helps to create fear and of course, it makes money, lots and lots of money…..
COVID Cases and the fear factor – Dr Jensen calls out ‘ridiculous’ CDC Guidelines for Coronavirus related deaths.
Dr. Scott Jensen, a Minnesota family physician who is also a Republican state senator, told “The Ingraham Angle” that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) guidelines for doctors to certify whether a patient has died of coronavirus are “ridiculous” and could be misleading the public. He states:
“Right now Medicare has determined that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you’ll get paid $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator, you get $39,000; three times as much. Nobody can tell me, after 35 years in the world of medicine, that sometimes those kinds of things [have] impact on what we do.”
Kary B. Mullis, who developed the PCR test was a biochemist who won the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for discovering a way to analyse DNA easily and cheaply sadly died in August 2019 so he can’t speak up now but;
David James from Off Guardian writes:
“There has been a great deal of controversy over claims that Kary Mullis, the creator of the PCR technology that is being widely used to test for so-called ‘cases’ of COVID-19, did not believe the technology was suitable for detecting a meaningful presence of a virus.
Those making these assertions were attacked and ‘fact checked’ (deemed inappropriate by propagandists) by news outlets claimingthat Mullis’ comments had been taken out of context.
So when a video surfaces with Mullis talking about the efficacy of the technology it is worth paying close attention to what he is saying. He died last year, so it is the best ‘fact check’ available. In the video, Mullis is discussing AIDS. He first deals with a criticism from the audience that the PCR technology is being misused.”
Dr Sam Bailey
In her video ‘The Truth About PCR Tests’ Dr Sam Bailey shows just how poor this test is for diagnosis of viruses.
Dr Sam Bailey was “fact-checked” by AFP. Asked to take the film down, even by friends. Here is her rebuttal video.
So of the people complaining about Dr Sam’s video, one is a producer of PCR tests and one is connected to billionaire Bill’s foundation and the Oxford Vaccine. Mmmmm.
Crimes Against Humanity
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich warns that the current geopolitical changes in the World are to be regarded as crimes against humanity since they are not based on science nor reason.
Dr. Michael Yeadon is an independent biotech consultant with 32 years of experience in research and development with big pharma — including Pfizer at senior management level — and within biotechnology as a company founder. He claims that half or even “almost all” of tests for COVID are false positives.
Why were proven treatments for the virus banned and denied?
New York Judge Saves 80-Year-Old COVID-19 Patient By Ordering Hospital To Give Her Ivermectin….
“Ms. Smentkiewicz got her first dose of Ivermectin on January 2. She made a “complete turnaround.” Smentkiewicz was taken off the ventilator, and transferred out of the intensive care unit within 48 hours.”
Elizabeth Lee Vliet, MD asks: Why Are Some Governors Blocking Physicians’ Attempts to Save Lives in Coronavirus Pandemic?
“While people’s lives and jobs are being devastated by the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19), and there has been no FDA-approved treatment, governors or state pharmacy boards in Nevada, Michigan, New York, Ohio, and Texas are issuing emergency orders to restrict which medications doctors can use to save lives.
These politicians have no background in infectious disease, medicine, research design, or epidemiology, yet they presume to dictate to front-line physicians who are reading the emerging research and caring for patients”.
The Evidence based medicine consultancy are asking for ivermectin to be approved as a treatment for COVID.
You can see Dr Tess Lawrie of www.bird-group.org – British Ivermectin recommendation Development speak about this.
So does Dr Sebastian Rushworth.
There are obviously many, many more papers and articles on both ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, you’ll see another one below in the next section.
Dr Vandana Shiva is a physicist and activist, read her take on the situation in India from September 2020: The Pandemic Is a Consequence of the War Against Life she states:
According to the International Labour Organization, “1.6 billion informal economy workers (representing the most vulnerable in the labour market), out of a worldwide total of two billion and a global workforce of 3.3 billion, have suffered massive damage to their capacity to earn a living. This is due to lockdown measures and/ or because they work in the hardest-hit sectors.” According to the World Food Programme, a quarter of a billion additional people will be pushed to hunger and 300,000 could die every day. These, too, are pandemics that are killing people. Killing cannot be a prescription for saving lives.
Health is about life and living systems. There is no “life” in the paradigm of health that Bill Gates and his ilk are promoting and imposing on the entire world.
Hear too from Australian, Alan Jones of Sky News: ‘This is what government refuses to tell you’ regarding Australian’s not being allowed to return home from India. He delivers interesting Information you may not be aware of:
This article on India may surprise you: ‘COVID-19 cases plummet as the country turns to Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.’
Asymptomatic Transmission – The reason we’ve all been told we cannot go near anyone, even if we are well. See Dr Sam’s video which de bunks this ‘idea’ too.
Dr Sam Bailey Asymptomatic Transmission? Sounds pretty dodgy. Time to blow the lid on this one…
During Dr Mike Yeadon’s ‘Can lockdown’s ever work’ he also speaks about variants and vaccines. He’s interviewed by Dan Astin-Gregory whose podcast is dedicated to telling the untold story of the coronavirus pandemic.
On the 22/03/21 The UK Medical Freedom Alliance wrote an open letter to GPs and Vaccinators to highlight important legal and medical issues around obtaining full and informed consent to Covid-19 vaccination. Did you get this?
Now, whether you are an advocate of vaccines or not, you might be surprised to know that there was a meeting about vaccine hesitancy in September 2019.
You’ll know that the MHRA are the people who dictate that we can buy an essential life saving B12 injection from a hair salon but not from our pharmacies. They do however want all of us to have a vaccine for something that might affect 0.01% of the population, regardless of the risk to life.
The UK Government states:
“Despite availability of vaccines, the number of countries reporting hesitancy has steadily increased since 2014 (Lane et al., 2018). Therefore, there is a need to understand what governments and partners can do to tackle this problem”.
You may be interested in the balanced view of Dr John Lee, Prof of Pathology on the UK Unlocked Documentary:
Peter Doshi, associate editor of the BMJ states: Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines—let’s be cautious and first see the full data
Banned paper: Doctors’ risk-versus-benefit assessment of Covid jabs – Read about COVID Vaccines: Necessity, Efficacy and Safety.
Christian Elliot has eloquently given a background which you may find of interest too.
And if you are thinking about letting your child have this vaccine please see this information from I can decide.org
See Dr Malcolm Kendrick’s blog Covid 19 and the end of scientific discussion detailing the complaints against him for speaking out.
Whether we like it or not, there is an agenda to get people vaccinated. We are being bombarded and this ‘advertising’ is to continue. The NHS and it’s employees have been using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. The link below has now been removed but you might be interested to know that the image underneath is what the preview looked like,:
It was removed shortly after the 9th of April (funny that) but you can read it here.
You’ll see that the document was produced with Mindspace, whose tagline is Influencing behaviour through public policy.
There are so many speaking out against the coercion and safety of vaccines:
This rebuttal letter to European Medicines Agency from Doctors for Covid Ethics, April 1, 2021 states:
‘We acknowledge receipt of your March 23 reply to our letter dated February 28, seeking reassurance that foreseeable risks of gene-based COVID-19 “vaccines” had been ruled out in animal trials prior to human use. Our concerns arise from multiple lines of evidence, including that the SARS-CoV-2 “spike protein” is not a passive docking protein, but its production is likely to initiate blood coagulation via multiple mechanisms.
You understand that coercive pressure is being placed on citizens to receive COVID-19 vaccines, which are experimental medical treatments. Your responsibility to those citizens includes ensuring that they are informed of the adverse event risks of every such treatment. To date you have failed to do so, and have instead misled the public on the reality of the “vaccines’” risk-benefit profile.
If you continue to conceal the truth, efforts will be made to bring this to light and to see that justice is done. For the sake of the injured and the dead, and to protect further lives from similar fates.’
Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi warns of the possible complications and dangers of experimental gene-therapy injections. – ‘Blood clots and beyond’.
Should it be that healthcare students are coerced into taking a vaccine when their chance of getting COVID is 0.01%?
UK Column’s article: A Deceptive Construction – Why We Must Question The COVID 19 Mortality Statistics
‘Just like nearly every other mortality cause, COVID-19 risks increase proportionately with age. Statistics for those of working age show a population mortality risk of between 0.0166% and 0.0046%, depending upon who you believe. The COVID-19 risk to the working age population is statistically insignificant. For the under 18’s it is statistically zero.’
You can also hear from a senior NHS Board member here she states:
The senior NHS Board member warns that the government is now controlling the NHS, and it is the government that is actually dictating what the NHS should do during Covid emergency measures. She states that the result of the government’s enforced Covid and vaccination policies can be described as genocide. Government messaging to her senior NHS colleagues is removing their capacity for rational thought, and they are effectively being mind controlled to implement policies which, in more rational moments, they would challenge as wrong. Fear prevails, and she and her board colleagues are being expected to toe an unwritten policy line, set predominantly in conference calls with no written record. She warns that if her privately troubled colleagues do not speak out, “your children will be next”.
Vaccine passports are a serious threat to freedom
See US lawyer Mat Staver speaking about this, he says, ‘under the law, nobody can be forced to take the experimental shot, which was only authorized under Emergency Use provisions. Vaccine passports must also be resisted’.
Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson states: Either the Vaccines Work. Or They Don’t.
He says health officials can’t have it both ways — either the vaccines are “highly effective” and the fully vaccinated can stop wearing masks and self-isolating, or the vaccines don’t work.
“If the vaccines work, why are the vaccinated still banned from living normal lives?”
It’s a “legitimate public health mystery,” Carlson said, adding: “Either it works, or doesn’t. But it can’t be simultaneously ‘highly effective’ and at the same time not restore people’s lives to normal.”
What to do next?
Stand up for your freedom, dare to ask questions, say no to mandatory vaccines and vaccine passports. Have it if you want to but don’t coerce those around you into having it. Share information. Meet with family and friends.
Humanity on it’s feet
And after so much heavy information, I wanted to share this film from London 24.04.21 – you may have heard bits about the protests on the news, but you may not have seen this joyous film.
THE PUSHBACK | ORACLE FILMS | THE DAY THE WORLD STOOD TOGETHER #DARETOTHINK
If you are still here, thank you for reading, and….
Remember that evil relies on you NOT believing.
You are a sovereign being.
Your freedom is not, never has been and never will be selfish.
#Dare to think.